Build the
case, then
ship.
Quoven turns the public record — X, Reddit, Hacker News, App Stores, G2, Capterra, the open web — into a sourced dossier on your next product bet. Every claim cited. Every chart traceable. Defend the decision in any room.
“Multi-currency invoicing for freelancers, with crypto auto-convert.”
Demand is real but narrow — concentrated among EU freelance technologists who already touch USDC weekly. Wise and Deel treat crypto as a second-class flow.
“Wise is great until you bill in USDC. Then it’s a four-tab gymnastics routine.”
“Crypto support is technically there but feels bolted on — you can tell their P&L lives in fiat.”
Verdict & confidence
Every dossier closes with a calibrated call — go, refine, or pass — with a 0–1 confidence score backed by the evidence. No vibes.
Sourced citations
Every claim points back to a real post, review, or store listing — clickable, dated, attributed. No silent hallucinations, no “trust me.”
Traceable charts
Demand curves, sentiment splits, competitor heat — every data point links back to the sources that produced it. Hover a bar, see the posts.
Frame the bet.
One paragraph: what you would build, who it is for, what you want to know. Five minutes, max.
Quoven reads the room.
Live searches across X, Reddit, Hacker News, App Store / Play Store reviews, G2, Capterra, and the open web — thousands of posts surfaced, attributed, dated.
Sign & file.
A sourced report lands in your library: verdict, charts, citations. Shareable by link, exportable, defensible.
Should we build this?
You have a one-paragraph bet. Before you write a spec, you want to know whether the public record agrees the problem is real, urgent, and unowned.
- —Demand signal & vocabulary
- —Existing solutions, reviewed
- —Gaps and unmet needs
- —Risks and counter-signals
“Multi-currency invoicing for freelancers, with crypto auto-convert.”
Should we ship this feature?
Your roadmap is contested. You need evidence — not vibes — to argue for or against shipping a specific feature now.
- —Demand for the feature & phrasing
- —How competitors already cover it
- —Adjacent requests competing for priority
- —Signals that argue for or against shipping
“Add native Stripe Tax to our SaaS billing flow.”
Where is this incumbent weakest?
You need to position against a competitor — and want concrete attack angles drawn from how real users describe its limitations.
- —What users genuinely praise
- —Recurring complaints and friction
- —Segments the incumbent serves poorly
- —Comparisons and attack angles
“Position a Notion alternative aimed at engineering teams.”
Does this new audience want what we have?
You are eyeing a new market. Before you rewrite the homepage, you want to hear the need in the new audience’s own words.
- —How the new audience phrases the need
- —What they currently use as a workaround
- —Products already positioned for them
- —Opportunity signals vs. warning signals
“Move our content tool from marketers to investor-relations teams.”
Plausible. Loud. Untraceable.
- — Sources implied, rarely linked.
- — Confident even when wrong.
- — Lives in a sidebar. Hard to share, harder to audit.
- — Re-running gives a different answer.
Sourced. Dated. Defensible.
- — Every claim cites a real post, review, or listing.
- — Calibrated confidence, not bravado.
- — A document you can share, version, and bring to a room.
- — Each run lives in your library, with full provenance.
Try Quoven on a single idea.
Validate ideas at a steady pace.
Go deep with advanced research.